As I wrote about the other week, Google’s been under a lot of heat for collecting too much wifi data when wardriving around in their Street View cars to amass their database of wifi fingerprints in order to figure out where people are for both the benefit of their consumers and advertisers without having to rely on carriers and GPS. Google came forward and said that the hard drives in the cars were recording not just access point SSIDs but packets transmitted to and from those access points and devices and computers connected to them, insisting that it was an honest mistake and that they were cooperating with governments, their law enforcement agencies and independent auditors, yada yada yada, to expunge the data in a manner that makes everyone happy.

I believed them, naturally, so I stuck my neck out asking you all to give them a pass on this, and at least one of you acquiesced. Mission accomplished.

But now, Slashdot is reporting that Google actually filed for a patent in January (still pending) outlining, apparently, the very practice they are claiming they had no knowledge of doing or desire to do, deep packet inspection, purportedly for the purpose of further zeroing in on locations. Ouch.

All right, so this is a minor setback for me in my attempts to make you all love Google but I’m not giving up. I’m posting this now preemptively to come clean on their behalf before David K jumps on this, cleverly spinning it up somehow to make Google look bad, but my next move is to plow through the patent application in order to extract probative clues that this practice would in fact benefit location acquisition with ping times and whatnot (it’s complicated) and that the way in which they gathered it up, in particular by switching channels on their wifi receivers five times a second, would offer nothing of value in terms of spying on what people are doing — just where they are doing it. If I can get that, I’ll report back with another plea for forgiveness. If not, I suppose I’ll try to change the subject.

Doug Simmons

Previous articleNightly Roundup Of WP7 Apps
Next articleAT&T to Sell Decent Android Phone
Biographical info.. hmm. I have a history of not being able to strike the balance between what is "safe" to put into these forms and what is, in my mind at least, funny. Can't do it.


  1. Just an example of a big company with too many gears not moving in the same direction. From what I read a few weeks back this was all just legacy code some employee was writing that got lumped in. Not to mention that just because a patent is applied for does not mean they intended to use it. We could go for days on useless patents so I won’t start down that line. However, Google desperately needs to get their shit together. They’re just too big to be making these sort of facebook style mistakes now.

  2. See they had a good coverup story…one that almost made them seem like a bunch of guys just doing business and something incidental happened and they’re really sorry…turns out they’re full of shit. Fool you twice…shame on you Simmons.

  3. […] of 78.62. Apple came in 6th (76.29) and Microsoft in 11th (74.47). Here’s the thing – Google has this little legal issue going on about intentionally data mining (and they were offering to delete data when caught which may have […]

Comments are closed.