All that being said the mindless drones will still buy an IPhone. They will still tell you their phone is better. They will not buy a Windows phone because they are stubborn and like to follow the sheep.
Loading...
flavio cannavò
they have not lied because lumia 920 is not available yet
Loading...
Joe
True, but it does exist. So even though it’s not available to consumers, the fact that it exists means they lied. Although that’s not unusual for Apple.
Loading...
A
I’m not saying your conclusion is incorrect, but there are many other critical parameters in measuring display quality. For instance, color quality, battery life, size.
For example, Apple focused on getting the iPhone 5 thin and chose an in-cell touch screen technology, rather than the most sensitive touch sensors. Another assumption above is that a big screen is better than a small one, which is obviously not true (nor is the inverse). A phone the size of an iPad or an iPod Shuffle would both suck. The optimal size is somewhere near where the iPhone 5/Nokia 920 sit and is a matter of opinion. The idea of the retina display is any improvement beyond that is meaningless because the eye can’t detect it, so that’s a tie.
Engineering is about trade-offs and Apple chose differently than Nokia. If you just pick the areas where Nokia focused and ignore the ones that Apple did you’ll get a biased answer.
Loading...
Jason
The 920 is screen is better in all normally measured parameters. You’re in serious denial.
Loading...
yup@aol.com
Microsoft and Nokia. Nuff said. Good luck and good night.
#switchtolumia
All that being said the mindless drones will still buy an IPhone. They will still tell you their phone is better. They will not buy a Windows phone because they are stubborn and like to follow the sheep.
they have not lied because lumia 920 is not available yet
True, but it does exist. So even though it’s not available to consumers, the fact that it exists means they lied. Although that’s not unusual for Apple.
I’m not saying your conclusion is incorrect, but there are many other critical parameters in measuring display quality. For instance, color quality, battery life, size.
For example, Apple focused on getting the iPhone 5 thin and chose an in-cell touch screen technology, rather than the most sensitive touch sensors. Another assumption above is that a big screen is better than a small one, which is obviously not true (nor is the inverse). A phone the size of an iPad or an iPod Shuffle would both suck. The optimal size is somewhere near where the iPhone 5/Nokia 920 sit and is a matter of opinion. The idea of the retina display is any improvement beyond that is meaningless because the eye can’t detect it, so that’s a tie.
Engineering is about trade-offs and Apple chose differently than Nokia. If you just pick the areas where Nokia focused and ignore the ones that Apple did you’ll get a biased answer.
The 920 is screen is better in all normally measured parameters. You’re in serious denial.
Microsoft and Nokia. Nuff said. Good luck and good night.