Let’s compare the iPhone 5’s screen to the Lumia 920’s

by David K on September 20, 2012

Wow

Lumia screen

I don’t know who put this together but I like it.

Print-friendly

Category: iPhone, Windows Phone 9 comments »

9 Responses to “Let’s compare the iPhone 5’s screen to the Lumia 920’s”

  1. Ramon Trotman
    September 20th, 2012 at 6:15 pm

    #switchtolumia
  2. Sandrobber
    September 20th, 2012 at 9:40 pm

    All that being said the mindless drones will still buy an IPhone. They will still tell you their phone is better. They will not buy a Windows phone because they are stubborn and like to follow the sheep.
  3. flavio cannavò
    September 21st, 2012 at 8:37 am

    they have not lied because lumia 920 is not available yet
  4. Joe
    September 21st, 2012 at 1:03 pm

    True, but it does exist. So even though it’s not available to consumers, the fact that it exists means they lied. Although that’s not unusual for Apple.
  5. Think the iPhone 5 Has the “World’s Most Advanced Display”? You’re Wrong.
    September 21st, 2012 at 2:16 pm

    [...] Mobility Digest has a post exploring the screen of the iPhone 5, described by Apple CEO Tim Cook as the “world’s most advanced display” at the launch event, and comparing it to the screen on the recently announced Lumia 920 (and the 900). The result? Cook is either ignorant of his competition, or he lied. If he is emulating Steve Jobs, then we’ll place money on the latter, but who knows? [...]
  6. A
    September 25th, 2012 at 11:12 am

    I’m not saying your conclusion is incorrect, but there are many other critical parameters in measuring display quality. For instance, color quality, battery life, size.

    For example, Apple focused on getting the iPhone 5 thin and chose an in-cell touch screen technology, rather than the most sensitive touch sensors. Another assumption above is that a big screen is better than a small one, which is obviously not true (nor is the inverse). A phone the size of an iPad or an iPod Shuffle would both suck. The optimal size is somewhere near where the iPhone 5/Nokia 920 sit and is a matter of opinion. The idea of the retina display is any improvement beyond that is meaningless because the eye can’t detect it, so that’s a tie.

    Engineering is about trade-offs and Apple chose differently than Nokia. If you just pick the areas where Nokia focused and ignore the ones that Apple did you’ll get a biased answer.
  7. Jason
    September 29th, 2012 at 1:53 pm

    The 920 is screen is better in all normally measured parameters. You’re in serious denial.
  8. It’s hard to imagine a phone with more top rated features than the Lumia 920 - Mobility Digest
    October 9th, 2012 at 11:00 am

    [...] Fastest touchscreen; super sensitive ultra bright and anti-glare with retina resolution topping the iPhone 5’s [...]
  9. yup@aol.com
    October 11th, 2012 at 12:32 am

    Microsoft and Nokia. Nuff said. Good luck and good night.

↑ Back to top